District Consumer Forum, Ganjam,Berhampur.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/124
Smt. Susmita Padhy, W/o- Sri Ashok Kumar Padhy, DNK Colony, Qtr No- G-9, PO/Ps/Dist- Koraput.
………..Appellant(s)
Vs.
1. B. Koteswar Rao, S/o- Late Venkateswar Rao, At Vizewada, Psand Dist- Vizewada(AP). At present residing at Phoolbag, At/Po/Ps- Bobilli, Dist- Vizianagram(AP).
2. B. Ramakrishna, S/o- Late V. Rao, address as per the SL No-1 At present staff of Venketeswar Real Estates, In front of RTC Complex, At/Po/Ps- Narasanapeta, Dist- Srikakulam(AP).
3. Banju Mohan Rao, S/o- B. Chandra Sekharam, AT- Doganaputtuga, Po/Ps-/Mandal Kaviti, Via- Sompeta, Dist- Srikakula, AP.Partner of Sri BhgyaLaxmi Real Estates, Berhmpur.
4. Banju Baikuntha Rao,S/o- B. Chandra Sekharam, AT- Doganaputtuga, Po/Ps-/Mandal Kaviti, Via- Sompeta, Dist- Srikakula, AP.Partner of Sri BhgyaLaxmi Real Estates, Berhmpur.
5.Banju Raja Rao, S/o- B. Chandra Sekharam, AT- Doganaputtuga, Po/Ps-/Mandal Kaviti, Via- Sompeta, Dist- Srikakula, AP.Partner of Sri BhgyaLaxmi Real Estates, Berhmpur.
6.Dukka Dharma Rao, S/o- Dukka Errayya, At- Ram Nagar,2nd Lane, Ps- BN Pur, Berhmpur, Dist- Ganjam, bearer Lanjipalli Shanti Surakshya Committee, Berhmpur, Dist- Ganjam, Partner of Sri Bhagyalaxmi.
7. Tushar Kanta Das, S/o- Late Sarat Chandra Das, At- Jemadeipentho Street, Berhmpur,Po- Navin Post Office, Ps- B Town,Berhmpur, Dist- Ganjam.
8. Smt. Purnima Patnaik, W/o- Sri Khetrabasi Pattnaik, At- Block Colony, Po/Ps/Dist- Koraput.
………..Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
1. Mr.Harish Chandra Nayak
2. Smt. Shanti Panigrahi
3. Mr. N Tuna Sahu
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Mr G.K Panda and Mr. U.K Pradhan
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
ORDER
The Advocate for complainant is absent. We have gone through the complaint petition. The advocate for complainant has not complied the order dt 15.10.09 within twentyone days as per rule 9(7) of the CP Act, 2005. Hence the case is rejected. Return the IPO to the Advocate for complainant which has filed at the time of filling. Issue copy of orders to the complainant free of cost.
The Advocate for complainant is absent. We have gone through the complaint petition. The advocate for complainant has not complied the order dt 15.10.09 within twentyone days as per rule 9(7) of the CP Act, 2005. Hence the case is rejected. Return the IPO to the Advocate for complainant which has filed at the time of filling. Issue copy of orders to the complainant free of cost.
………………….
Mr.Harish Chandra Nayak
………………….
Smt. Shanti Panigrahi
………………….
Mr. N Tuna Sahu
Tags: B. Koteswar Rao