Madan Das v HDFC Bank

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, HOOGHLY

C.C.CASE NO.82 OF 2008

Sri. Madan Das,

Sadhu Charan Mukherjee Rd.,

P.O. & P.S. Chandannagar,

Dist.Hooghly.

…                    Complainant

-vs-

1. The Sr. Manager, HDFC Bank,

Jeevandeep Building,

Middleton Street,

Kolkata – 71.

2. The Br. Manager,

HDFC Bank,

G.T. Rd, P.O. Konnagar,

P.S. Uttarpara,

Dist.    Hooghly  ………     OP.

Present : D.K.Basu   President

Reeta Roychowdhury Malakar Member

Date of delivery of judgement – 09.12.2009

Order no. 19.

The complainant is absent without taking any step. On rep[eated calls, none appears on his behalf.

It is now 12.17 p.m.

The record shows that 04.08.09, 09.09.009,10.11.09 and today i.e. 09.12.09 fixed for taking step upon the op 2 but the complainant is reluctant to take step upon op 2. Furthermore, the complainant does not take any step today.

The op 1 by filing a petition praying for time for filing w/v. Considered.

As the complainant is absent today and as the complainant has not taking any step upon op 2 inspite of granting several days . It seems that he is not interested in his case. Considering all these the case is dismissed for default

Tags:

One Response to “Madan Das v HDFC Bank”

  1. Sabyashchi Adhikary says:

    HDFC,Jeevandeep Building.I applied for H.B.Loan in july/2010 for purchasing flat in Rajarhat,SiddhaTown. loan has yet not been finalised. As a result, I have already paid first instalment from my end. Demand for second instalment will be issued in day or two. Please finalise the loan immediately & let me know the status so that I need not bear further instalment. Kindly treat as URGENT

Leave a Reply