ACHHAN RIZVI (V) Vs. STATE OF U.P.

PETITIONER:
ACHHAN RIZVI (V)

Vs.

RESPONDENT:
STATE OF U.P.

DATE OF JUDGMENT01/12/1992

BENCH:
VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J)
BENCH:
VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J)
RAY, G.N. (J)

CITATION:
1994 SCC  (6) 761      JT 1992 (6)    730

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

JUDGMENT:
ORDER
1.   Heard counsel for all the parties.
2.   We     have  perused the substance of the  report  of     the
observer   telephonically  communicated     to  the   Registrar
General     of  this Court.  The report was also shown  to     the
learned counsel for all the parties.
3.   So far as the steps contemplated in para 9 of the order
dated  28-11-1992 are concerned, it may be  appropriate     and
beneficial  for the ensurement of the implementation of     the
undertaking given by the State Government that due publicity
be given to the fact that the proposed ‘Kar Seva’from  6-12-
1992  would not involve any construction activity or  moving
of  any     building  material into the  acquired    land.    Such
publicity  might  inform  all  those  concerned     about     the
limitations  of     the purpose of gathering, if  any,  at     the
place.    We direct both the Central Government and the  State
Government to issue appropriate publicity through such media
as  might  seem appropriate including  Doordarshan  and     All
India Radio.  This shall be done immediately.
762
4.   List the case on 4-12-1992 at 2.00 p.m.
Court Master

Leave a Reply