Archive for January, 2009

Malati sahoo v CESCO

Friday, January 30th, 2009

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JAGATSINGHPUR

PRESENT:-   SRI S.N.MISHRA,PRESIDENT.

A N D

SRI   B.C. SWAIN, MEMBERS.

MRS. M.M.RATH, MEMBERS.

Consumer Complaint No.78 of 2008

Date of Filing: -12.06.2008

Date of Judgment: -30.01.2009

Malati sahoo

w/o-Hadibandhu sahoo

vill-sujauddin nagar

Po-Manijanga

Ps-Tirtol

Dist-Jagatsinghpur

………………………….complainant

Versus

1.     Manager,CESCO,Jagatsinghpur

2.      Asst.Manager, CESCO,Tirtol

At/Po-Tirtol

Jagatsinghpur

1.     Jr.Manager , CESCO,Tirtol

At/Po-Tirtol

Jagatsinghpur

………………………..opp.parties

In short the case of the complainant is that he has been  availing energy from o.ps. vide No.0417251 for domestic consumption since 1999 and installed a  meter to record consumption of energy and paid the  consumption charges regularly. But vide bill dt. 22.10.07  the CESCO (o.ps.) served a bill on her demanding  arrear of Rs.5,562/-. The meter reading has not been taken  to account while submitting bill since inception . the  CESCO Deptt.(o.ps) are not considering  her allegation in this regard but threatening to disconnect the line  hence she sustained mental agony and filed this complaint.

In their joint written version these o.ps. (CESCO)  have challenged the maintainability of this proceeding  in law and facts due to want of cause of  action. According to these o.ps. this proceeding is barred by law of limitation hance not maintainable. Disputing  the consumer number of complainant and stating the correct number as 03265942 it is submitted that complainant is not regular payee of consumption  charges. Admiting issuance of demand note dt.22.10.07 for Rs.5,562.40 towards arrear it is submitted that  such arrear is increasing day by day due to non clearing of the same, hence power supply may be    with held for non making payment of such dues in  future days to come as such no deficiency  in service has been caused to complainant.

Out of such pleadings of both the parties as  stated above, it seems to be an admitted case that  complainant is consuming electric energy from o.ps.  on payment of consumption charges, as such, coming  within meaning of ‘consumer’ defined in the Act. The contention of complainant vide para-3 of complaint petition that on 22.10.07 for the first time the CESCO  people served a bill demanding Rs.5,562.48 towards  arrear is not accepted as is  contradicting to evidence  on record. Said arrear has been shown vide bills  19.06.04 onwards available on record . from May 04  onwards till 18.11.07 it is revealed that meter reading  are taken to account while serving usual bills.  Therefore allegation of complainant that meter reading  is not taken to account while preparing and submitting bill stands rejected.

Out of Xerox copy of written allegation dt. 16.7.04 of complainant  to J.E. Rahama section it is  revealed that bills dt. 30.11.03, 27.10.03 and  28.09.03 for Rs.150/- + Rs.200/- + Rs.300/- + Rs.500/- = Rs.1,150/- though are being paid by complainant  these o.ps. has not done necessary correction. It is  not known whether such correction is carried out, or ,  not. This evidence of the year 16.7.04 needs no  challenge/ interference within  this Act in this  proceeding as is his U/s.24 of the Act. Out of  notice dt.14.11.07 of complaint case No.GRF/JED/52/07 it is again  revealed that a dispute between both the parties was subject matter before the competent authority within OERC rules and Acts and the out  come of said proceeding is not  placed on record by either of the parties.

Under such  facts of this complaint the sole  allegation of complainant being revision of bills ,  the O.Ps. would not be prejudiced in any manner if  be directed to bring necessary revision/ correction  of bills relating to complainant and submit fresh bill taking the previous payments and present meter  reading to active consideration  enabling complainant to make payment of such bill on easy installments in the ends of natural justice.

ORDER

In the result this complaint is allowed in  part on contest against opposite parties without cost . the opposite parties shall have to revise the  bills  in consonance to actual units  consumed by complainant taking present meter reading to account adjusting previous payments of Rs.1,150/- and  submit a fresh and corrected bill to complainant within 30 days from the date of order.

Pronounced in the open forum on 30th day of January,2009.

Smt.M.M.Rath                 B.C.Swain                                  S.N.Mishra

MEMBER                                  MEMBER                                             PRESIDENT